Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Sacramento

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Congenital Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:
100.0
Cases per 100,000 live births
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 100.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 46.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 151.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (114.9), Sacramento has a value of 100.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(114.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (100.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (105.3).
Prior Value
(105.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9)

County: Sacramento Death Rate Among Persons with Diagnosed HIV Infection

Current Value:
5.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (5.4), Sacramento has a value of 5.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.4)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (5.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4.6).
Prior Value
(4.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

279.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 279.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 140.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 212.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (230.9), Sacramento has a value of 279.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(230.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (214.0), Sacramento has a value of 279.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (279.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (286.3).
Prior Value
(286.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento HIV Diagnosis Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento HIV Diagnosis Rate

12.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 12.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.2), Sacramento has a value of 12.2.
CA Value
(12.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (12.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.4).
Prior Value
(11.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento HIV Prevalence Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento HIV Prevalence Rate

351.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (418.7), Sacramento has a value of 351.4.
CA Value
(418.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (386.6), Sacramento has a value of 351.4.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (351.4) is greater  than the previously measured value (349.8).
Prior Value
(349.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons Living and Diagnosed with HIV who are in Care

Current Value:
78.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 78.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (73.7%), Sacramento has a value of 78.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(73.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (78.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (77.7%).
Prior Value
(77.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Persons Living with HIV Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Persons Living with HIV Rate

308.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (355.6), Sacramento has a value of 308.8.
CA Value
(355.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (308.8) is greater  than the previously measured value (98.6).
Prior Value
(98.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Syphilis Incidence Rate

30.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 30.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (22.3), Sacramento has a value of 30.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.2), Sacramento has a value of 30.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (30.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (25.0).
Prior Value
(25.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults who Smoke

5.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Sacramento has a value of 5.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Sacramento has a value of 5.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (5.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Sacramento Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

Current Value:
4.3%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Sacramento has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (4.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
1.5%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.4%), Sacramento has a value of 1.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.9%), Sacramento has a value of 1.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (1.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.7%).
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults Who Are Obese

31.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 31.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (28.8%), Sacramento has a value of 31.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Sacramento has a value of 31.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (31.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.4%).
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:
60.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 60.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (62.3%), Sacramento has a value of 60.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(62.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.7%), Sacramento has a value of 60.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (60.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.5%).
Prior Value
(66.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Children who are Overweight for Age

Current Value:
16.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (16.6%), Sacramento has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (16.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.1%).
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Teens who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:
54.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (37.4%), Sacramento has a value of 54.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(37.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (54.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (43.3%).
Prior Value
(43.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Child and Teen Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

97.6%
(2013-2014)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (94.8%), Sacramento has a value of 97.6% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(94.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.

County: Sacramento Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Frequent Physical Distress

11.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.3%), Sacramento has a value of 11.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Sacramento has a value of 11.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (11.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.6%).
Prior Value
(12.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Insufficient Sleep

38.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 38.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 38.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.0%), Sacramento has a value of 38.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Sacramento Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

13.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.7%), Sacramento has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
3.6
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 3.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 3.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (3.1), Sacramento has a value of 3.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(3.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3), Sacramento has a value of 3.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (3.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3).
Prior Value
(3.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

89.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 89.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (86.0%), Sacramento has a value of 89.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (89.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.6%).
Prior Value
(87.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Current Value:
19.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 19.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 19.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (17.9%), Sacramento has a value of 19.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Sacramento

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Voter Engagement

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Voter Engagement

74.3%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (66.2%), Sacramento has a value of 74.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(66.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (74.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (69.8%).
Prior Value
(69.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
82.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 82.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (80.7%), Sacramento has a value of 82.5% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(80.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (82.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (74.5%).
Prior Value
(74.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

County: Sacramento

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adult Arrest Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adult Arrest Rate

22.0
Arrests per 1,000 population 18+
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 22.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (25.1), Sacramento has a value of 22.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(25.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (22.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20.6).
Prior Value
(20.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
6.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.1), Sacramento has a value of 6.2 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Sacramento has a value of 6.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (6.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6).
Prior Value
(5.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Sacramento Deaths in Custody

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Deaths in Custody

0.2
Per 10,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (0.3), Sacramento has a value of 0.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (0.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.2).
Prior Value
(0.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Hate Crime Offenses

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Hate Crime Offenses

116
Offenses
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (116) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (78).
Prior Value
(78)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Juvenile Arrest Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Juvenile Arrest Rate

2.3
Arrests per 1,000 population aged 0-17
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 2.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (2.8), Sacramento has a value of 2.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(2.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (2.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.8).
Prior Value
(1.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Violent Crime Rate

563.4
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 563.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 449.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 621.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (493.1), Sacramento has a value of 563.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(493.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (380.7), Sacramento has a value of 563.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(380.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Federal Bureau of Investigation
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (563.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (499.0).
Prior Value
(499.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Average Household Size

2.80
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.90), Sacramento has a value of 2.80.
CA Value
(2.90)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Sacramento has a value of 2.80.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Foreign Born Persons

21.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (26.5%), Sacramento has a value of 21.2%.
CA Value
(26.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Sacramento has a value of 21.2%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Population Over Age 65 (Count)

230,399
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Veteran Population

6.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.7%), Sacramento has a value of 6.0%.
CA Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Sacramento has a value of 6.0%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

13.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (11.5), Sacramento has a value of 13.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Sacramento has a value of 13.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (13.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0).
Prior Value
(13.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

County: Sacramento Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

25.1%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 25.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (26.7%), Sacramento has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Sacramento has a value of 25.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (25.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Bicycle-Involved Collision Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Bicycle-Involved Collision Rate

0.6
Collisions per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 0.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0.
CA Counties
(2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.3), Sacramento has a value of 0.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (0.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.0).
Prior Value
(31.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Child Abuse Allegation Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Child Abuse Allegation Rate

58.1
Cases per 1,000 children
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (49.0), Sacramento has a value of 58.1 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(49.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (58.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (56.8).
Prior Value
(56.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Child Abuse Investigation Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Child Abuse Investigation Rate

32.8
Cases per 1,000 children
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (32.7), Sacramento has a value of 32.8 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(32.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (32.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.9).
Prior Value
(32.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
24.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 24.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 24.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Sacramento has a value of 24.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Sacramento has a value of 24.9%.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Alone

25.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 25.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 25.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Sacramento has a value of 25.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Sacramento has a value of 25.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

57,963
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Social Associations

7.0
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (6.0), Sacramento has a value of 7.0 which is higher and better.
CA Value
(6.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Sacramento has a value of 7.0 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (7.0) is less and worse than the previously measured value (7.2).
Prior Value
(7.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

5.8
Cases per 1,000 children
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.1), Sacramento has a value of 5.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(6.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Sacramento has a value of 5.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Children's Bureau
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (5.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.3).
Prior Value
(6.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.7)

County: Sacramento

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Community Spending on Transportation

Current Value:
16.3%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (15.7%), Sacramento has a value of 16.3%.
CA Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), Sacramento has a value of 16.3%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (16.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
3.0%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (3.0%), Sacramento has a value of 3.0%.
CA Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.2%), Sacramento has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (3.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.3%).
Prior Value
(3.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Mean Travel Time to Work

27.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 27.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 27.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Sacramento has a value of 27.8 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Sacramento has a value of 27.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
39.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 39.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 39.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (41.6%), Sacramento has a value of 39.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(41.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Sacramento has a value of 39.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (39.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.9%).
Prior Value
(39.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), Sacramento has a value of 1.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Sacramento has a value of 1.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Sacramento Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Workers who Drive Alone to Work

69.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 69.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 69.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), Sacramento has a value of 69.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Sacramento has a value of 69.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Workers who Walk to Work

1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), Sacramento has a value of 1.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Sacramento has a value of 1.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Employer Establishments

33,418
Number of Establishments
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (33,418) is greater  than the previously measured value (32,196).
Prior Value
(32,196)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 58.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 58.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (57.8%), Sacramento has a value of 58.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Sacramento has a value of 58.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
59.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 59.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 59.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (59.3%), Sacramento has a value of 59.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(59.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Sacramento has a value of 59.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Size of Labor Force

742,587
Persons
(August 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (742,587) is greater and better than the previously measured value (739,253).
Prior Value
(739,253)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Total Employment

522,807
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (522,807) is greater  than the previously measured value (491,908).
Prior Value
(491,908)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Total Employment Change

6.3%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.1%), Sacramento has a value of 6.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Sacramento has a value of 6.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (6.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (-4.0%).
Prior Value
(-4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Unemployed Veterans

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Unemployed Veterans

5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,128 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (4.3%), Sacramento has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.2%), Sacramento has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
5.4%
(August 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.9%), Sacramento has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.4%), Sacramento has a value of 5.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (5.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults Receiving Food Stamp Benefits

Current Value:
32.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 34.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.7%), Sacramento has a value of 32.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(31.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (32.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.3%).
Prior Value
(30.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Child Food Insecurity Rate

18.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 18.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 18.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.9%), Sacramento has a value of 18.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (18.5%), Sacramento has a value of 18.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (18.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.3%).
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Community Spending on Food

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Community Spending on Food

13.0%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (13.0%), Sacramento has a value of 13.0%.
CA Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.6%), Sacramento has a value of 13.0%.
US Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

34%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 34% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 34% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (35%), Sacramento has a value of 34% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(35%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Sacramento has a value of 34% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (34%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28%).
Prior Value
(28%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Food Insecurity Rate

11.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.6%), Sacramento has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Sacramento has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (11.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.1%).
Prior Value
(10.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Sacramento has a value of 56.3%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Sacramento has a value of 56.3%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Current Value:
39,648
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
19.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 19.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 19.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.8%), Sacramento has a value of 19.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (19.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (26.7%).
Prior Value
(26.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Projected Food Insecurity Rate

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Sacramento has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (13.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.4%).
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
50.7%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 50.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 51.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 61.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 50.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (52.6%), Sacramento has a value of 50.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Sacramento has a value of 50.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (50.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (48.9%).
Prior Value
(48.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Community Spending on Housing

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Community Spending on Housing

33.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (34.1%), Sacramento has a value of 33.7%.
CA Value
(34.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (32.1%), Sacramento has a value of 33.7%.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (33.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (33.7%).
Prior Value
(33.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
18.5%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 18.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 18.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (20.0%), Sacramento has a value of 18.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(20.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Sacramento has a value of 18.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (18.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.2%).
Prior Value
(20.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
13.8%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (14.0%), Sacramento has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Sacramento has a value of 13.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (13.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.1%).
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Homeowner Vacancy Rate

0.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Sacramento has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Sacramento has a value of 0.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Homeownership

55.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), Sacramento has a value of 55.8%.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Sacramento has a value of 55.8%.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Median Household Gross Rent

$1,599
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of $1,599 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,289 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,919.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value ($1,856), Sacramento has a value of $1,599 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($1,856)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Sacramento has a value of $1,599 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$659
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of $659 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $652 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $773.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value ($732), Sacramento has a value of $659 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($732)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Sacramento has a value of $659 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$2,276
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of $2,276 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,128 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,724.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value ($2,759), Sacramento has a value of $2,276 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($2,759)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Sacramento has a value of $2,276 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

32.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Sacramento has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Sacramento has a value of 32.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (32.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.9%).
Prior Value
(31.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Sacramento Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Overcrowded Households

5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Sacramento has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Sacramento has a value of 5.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

54.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 54.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 54.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Sacramento has a value of 54.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Sacramento has a value of 54.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Sacramento Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Severe Housing Problems

21.2%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 21.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 21.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (25.7%), Sacramento has a value of 21.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Sacramento has a value of 21.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (21.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.4%).
Prior Value
(21.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
4.9%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 4.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (4.6%), Sacramento has a value of 4.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Sacramento has a value of 4.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (4.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Gender Pay Gap

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Gender Pay Gap

$0.82
Cents on the dollar
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value ($0.77), Sacramento has a value of $0.82 which is higher and better.
CA Value
($0.77)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($0.73), Sacramento has a value of $0.82 which is higher and better.
US Value
($0.73)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento ($0.82) is greater and better than the previously measured value ($0.81).
Prior Value
($0.81)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Households Above the Federal Poverty Level and Below the Real Cost Measure

20.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (24.0%), Sacramento has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.

County: Sacramento Households Below the Real Cost Measure

Current Value:
30.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 30.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (34.0%), Sacramento has a value of 30.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.

County: Sacramento Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

55.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 55.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (57.0%), Sacramento has a value of 55.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(57.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (55.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (59.1%).
Prior Value
(59.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

32.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.0%), Sacramento has a value of 32.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(31.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (32.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.2%).
Prior Value
(28.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Income Inequality

0.444
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 0.444 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.461 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.481.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 0.444 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (0.490), Sacramento has a value of 0.444 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Sacramento has a value of 0.444 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Median Household Income

$84,010
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of $84,010 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $76,148 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $63,996.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of $84,010 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value ($91,905), Sacramento has a value of $84,010 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($91,905)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Sacramento has a value of $84,010 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Per Capita Income

$39,763
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of $39,763 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $37,717 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $32,012.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of $39,763 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value ($45,591), Sacramento has a value of $39,763 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($45,591)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Sacramento has a value of $39,763 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Children Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
36.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 36.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 36.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 44.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (35.4%), Sacramento has a value of 36.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(35.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5%), Sacramento has a value of 36.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (36.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (34.8%).
Prior Value
(34.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
17.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 17.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 17.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Sacramento has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Sacramento has a value of 17.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Families Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
22.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 22.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 22.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 825 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.3%), Sacramento has a value of 22.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (22.5%), Sacramento has a value of 22.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (22.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.6%).
Prior Value
(21.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Sacramento has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Sacramento has a value of 9.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
12.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 12.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.0%), Sacramento has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (12.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
27.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 27.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 27.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (27.7%), Sacramento has a value of 27.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (28.0%), Sacramento has a value of 27.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (27.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.4%).
Prior Value
(26.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
10.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Sacramento has a value of 10.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Sacramento has a value of 10.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
23,275
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
70.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 70.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 70.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Sacramento has a value of 70.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Sacramento has a value of 70.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People Living Below 200% of Poverty Level

Current Value:
28.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 28.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (27.6%), Sacramento has a value of 28.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(27.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (28.4%), Sacramento has a value of 28.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (28.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (27.6%).
Prior Value
(27.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 13.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Sacramento has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Sacramento has a value of 13.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Sacramento Veterans Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
7.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.7%), Sacramento has a value of 7.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Sacramento has a value of 7.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Youth not in School or Working

1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Sacramento has a value of 1.5%.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Sacramento has a value of 1.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Child Care Centers

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Child Care Centers

7.0
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 7.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (8.1), Sacramento has a value of 7.0 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Sacramento has a value of 7.0.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (7.0) is greater and better than the previously measured value (4.4).
Prior Value
(4.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
6.8%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 6.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (6.7%), Sacramento has a value of 6.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Sacramento has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (6.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Home Child Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
3.4%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (3.8%), Sacramento has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Sacramento has a value of 3.4%.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (3.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.7%).
Prior Value
(3.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento College Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
10.9%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.2%), Sacramento has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.4%), Sacramento has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (10.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Community Spending on Education

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Community Spending on Education

2.5%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.7%), Sacramento has a value of 2.5%.
CA Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Sacramento has a value of 2.5%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (2.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.5%).
Prior Value
(2.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
32.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 19.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Sacramento has a value of 32.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
88.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 88.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 88.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Sacramento has a value of 88.4% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Sacramento has a value of 88.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Student Loan Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
4.2%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 4.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (4.1%), Sacramento has a value of 4.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.7%), Sacramento has a value of 4.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (4.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.6%).
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
95.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 95.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 95.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 95.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (95.1%), Sacramento has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(95.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (95.0%), Sacramento has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Vocational, Technical, and Other School Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio

1.4%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 1.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.4%), Sacramento has a value of 1.4%.
CA Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.6%), Sacramento has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (1.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.5%).
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Student-to-Teacher Ratio

23.0
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 23.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 23.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.9), Sacramento has a value of 23.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Sacramento has a value of 23.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (23.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (22.7).
Prior Value
(22.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento 11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

49.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 49.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 43.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.8%), Sacramento has a value of 49.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (49.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (62.1%).
Prior Value
(62.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 11th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
25.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 25.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (27.0%), Sacramento has a value of 25.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (25.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (38.3%).
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Current Value:
40%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 40% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 37% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 31%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (42%), Sacramento has a value of 40% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(42%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (40%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (42%).
Prior Value
(42%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
41%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 41% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 32%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44%), Sacramento has a value of 41% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(44%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (41%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (43%).
Prior Value
(43%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Current Value:
42%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 42% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 40% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44%), Sacramento has a value of 42% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(44%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (42%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (44%).
Prior Value
(44%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 4th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
37%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 37% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 33% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (38%), Sacramento has a value of 37% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(38%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (37%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (38%).
Prior Value
(38%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Current Value:
45.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 45.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (47.1%), Sacramento has a value of 45.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (45.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (49.4%).
Prior Value
(49.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 5th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
28.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 28.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 20.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.6%), Sacramento has a value of 28.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (28.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (32.2%).
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Current Value:
44.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 44.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (45.1%), Sacramento has a value of 44.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(45.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (44.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (49.3%).
Prior Value
(49.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 6th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
33.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 26.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 22.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (32.5%), Sacramento has a value of 33.2% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (33.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (38.3%).
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Current Value:
47.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 47.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (49.2%), Sacramento has a value of 47.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (47.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (54.4%).
Prior Value
(54.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 7th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
31.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 31.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 23.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (32.0%), Sacramento has a value of 31.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (31.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (41.2%).
Prior Value
(41.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

Current Value:
44.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 44.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (46.6%), Sacramento has a value of 44.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (44.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (51.7%).
Prior Value
(51.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento 8th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
28.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 28.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 18.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2%), Sacramento has a value of 28.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(29.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (28.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (38.2%).
Prior Value
(38.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento High School Graduation

Current Value:

County: Sacramento High School Graduation

81.5%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 81.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (86.2%), Sacramento has a value of 81.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(86.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (86.5%), Sacramento has a value of 81.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (81.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (84.0%).
Prior Value
(84.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)

County: Sacramento

Environmental Health / Air

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Environmental Health / Air

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Air Pollution due to Particulate Matter

Current Value:
8.4
Micrograms per cubic meter
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 8.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 8.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,115 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (7.1), Sacramento has a value of 8.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(7.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4), Sacramento has a value of 8.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (8.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.8).
Prior Value
(12.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Annual Ozone Air Quality

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Annual Ozone Air Quality

5
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Sacramento has a value of 5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Annual Particle Pollution

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Annual Particle Pollution

5
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Sacramento has a value of 5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Current Value:
9,298
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (9,298) is less and better than the previously measured value (29,269).
Prior Value
(29,269)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
98.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 98.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 98.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (94.2%), Sacramento has a value of 98.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Sacramento has a value of 98.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (98.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (98.6%).
Prior Value
(98.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Access to Parks

89.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 89.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 89.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 9.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (79.5%), Sacramento has a value of 89.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (89.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (87.5%).
Prior Value
(87.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Food Environment Index

8.3
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 8.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 8.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.6), Sacramento has a value of 8.3 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Sacramento has a value of 8.3 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (8.3) is greater and better than the previously measured value (8.0).
Prior Value
(8.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Liquor Store Density

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Liquor Store Density

9.0
Stores per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.7.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 45 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 9.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.2), Sacramento has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.9), Sacramento has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (9.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0).
Prior Value
(9.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Proximity to Highways

5.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 5.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.8%), Sacramento has a value of 5.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (5.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.2%).
Prior Value
(5.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Sacramento

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento PBT Released

Current Value:

County: Sacramento PBT Released

655
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (655) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10).
Prior Value
(10)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

4,474
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 4,474 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4,532 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4,681.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (4,541), Sacramento has a value of 4,474 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(4,541)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (4,474) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3,821).
Prior Value
(3,821)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Number of Extreme Heat Days

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Number of Extreme Heat Days

13
Days
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (13) is less and better than the previously measured value (37).
Prior Value
(37)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Number of Extreme Heat Events

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Number of Extreme Heat Events

12
Events
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (12) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8).
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Current Value:
6
Days
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (6) is less and better than the previously measured value (9).
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Current Value:
47
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (47) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (44).
Prior Value
(44)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.