Search for Indicators
Health Topic Dashboard
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days
County: Sacramento Adults who Binge Drink: Last 30 Days
16.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Annual Opioid Prescription Rate
382.8
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(291.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(411.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Buprenorphine Prescription Rate
30.0
Prescriptions per 1,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(19.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(26.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to All Opioid Overdose
14.9
Rate per 100,000 residents
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(18.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(14.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Cancer
Health / Cancer
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults with Cancer
County: Sacramento Adults with Cancer
6.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
20.0
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 55 California counties.
CA Value
(17.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(19.3 in 2018-2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Prior Value
(20.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
145.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(122.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(146.0 in 2018-2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Prior Value
(147.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
14.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(12.9 in 2018-2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Cancer Institute
Prior Value
(14.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
Health / Diabetes
Health / Diabetes
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults with Diabetes
County: Sacramento Adults with Diabetes
12.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
28.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
CA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(28.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Disabilities
Health / Disabilities
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults with Disability
County: Sacramento Adults with Disability
31.9%
(2016)
Compared to:
CA Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(20.6% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(32.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care
County: Sacramento Adults Delayed or had Difficulty Obtaining Care
24.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(19.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Sacramento Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
69.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(76.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
County: Sacramento Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
93.9%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(91.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(95.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Adults without Health Insurance
County: Sacramento Adults without Health Insurance
6.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Sacramento Adults who Experienced a Stroke
3.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Sacramento Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Sacramento Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
72.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Adults with Heart Disease
County: Sacramento Adults with Heart Disease
7.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(7.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
51.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(37.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(48.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease
County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease
78.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(77.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(91.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(81.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Sacramento Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
24.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(20.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services
County: Sacramento Adults Needing and Receiving Behavioral Health Care Services
59.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(55.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(56.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress
County: Sacramento Adults with Likely Serious Psychological Distress
16.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adult Fast Food Consumption
County: Sacramento Adult Fast Food Consumption
63.7%
(2016)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(65.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(60.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Adults who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages
County: Sacramento Adults who Drink Sugar-Sweetened Beverages
13.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Older Adults
Health / Older Adults
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
34.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
37.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Disability
36.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(33.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
17.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(16.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Oral Health
Health / Oral Health
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Sacramento Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
11.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Sacramento Adults who Visited a Dentist
61.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(63.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Other Conditions
Health / Other Conditions
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults with Arthritis
County: Sacramento Adults with Arthritis
25.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Sacramento Adults with Kidney Disease
3.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Health / Respiratory Diseases
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults with Asthma
County: Sacramento Adults with Asthma
20.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(20.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Adults with COPD
County: Sacramento Adults with COPD
6.3%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sacramento Adults with Current Asthma
County: Sacramento Adults with Current Asthma
10.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Tobacco Use
Health / Tobacco Use
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults who Smoke
County: Sacramento Adults who Smoke
5.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(14.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Sacramento Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
County: Sacramento Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
4.3%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
CA Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Weight Status
Health / Weight Status
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Adults Who Are Obese
County: Sacramento Adults Who Are Obese
31.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sacramento Adults who are Overweight or Obese
County: Sacramento Adults who are Overweight or Obese
60.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
CA Value
(62.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(66.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Environmental Health / Built Environment
County: Sacramento
Value
Compared to:
County: Sacramento Access to Exercise Opportunities
County: Sacramento Access to Exercise Opportunities
98.7%
(2024)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(98.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sacramento Access to Parks
County: Sacramento Access to Parks
89.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
CA Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Prior Value
(87.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
