Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Diabetes

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

County: Sacramento

Value
Compared to:

County: Sacramento Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Adults with Diabetes

12.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 12.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7%), Sacramento has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Sacramento has a value of 12.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (12.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
28.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 28.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 56 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (23.6), Sacramento has a value of 28.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Sacramento has a value of 28.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (28.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (28.5).
Prior Value
(28.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Sacramento Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Sacramento Diabetes: Medicare Population

23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Sacramento has a value of 23.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Sacramento has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.0%), Sacramento has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Sacramento has a value of 23.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Sacramento (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Sacramento value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.